Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pyarrow version conflicts from Snowflake connector #4707

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024
Merged

Pyarrow version conflicts from Snowflake connector #4707

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

Jawahars
Copy link
Contributor

@Jawahars Jawahars commented Mar 5, 2024

Description

The mageai integration uses Pyarrow version 14.0.1 and Snowflake connector 3.4.0. But snowflake 3.4.0 restricts pyarrow>=10.0.1,<10.1.0. This requires building multiple pyarrow versions when using custom pyarrow build.

Fix

This issue addresses the strict pyarrow version dependency by snowflake. The fix is released in snowflake version 3.5.0. So, we are upgrading to Snowflake Connector 3.5.0

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist

  • The PR is tagged with proper labels (bug, enhancement, feature, documentation)
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added unit tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • If new documentation has been added, relative paths have been added to the appropriate section of docs/mint.json

cc:
@wangxiaoyou1993

@wangxiaoyou1993 wangxiaoyou1993 merged commit 9de2925 into mage-ai:master Mar 5, 2024
4 checks passed
@wangxiaoyou1993 wangxiaoyou1993 mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2024
15 tasks
oonyoontong pushed a commit to bunker-tech/mage-ai that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants