chore(ci): Make it possible to manually start the Bazel build and test job

[LKreutzer]

Signed-off-by: Lars Kreutzer lars.kreutzer@tngtech.com

Summary

• The workflow_dispatch trigger on the bazel workflow leads to a run of the bazel build and test job.
• This does not apply to the package job (do we want that?) (added it there too)

Test Plan

• Test run with workflow_dispatch on fork: https://github.com/LKreutzer/magma/actions/runs/2832839838

Additional Information

• This change is backwards-breaking

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening a PR! 💯

A couple initial guidelines

• All commits must be signed off. This is enforced by DCO check.
• All PR titles must follow the semantic commits format. This is enforced by Semantic PR.

Howto

• Reviews. The "Reviewers" listed for this PR are the Magma maintainers who will shepherd it.
• Checks. All required CI checks must pass before merge.
• Merge. Once approved and passing CI checks, use the ready2merge label to indicate the maintainers can merge your PR.

More info

Please take a moment to read through the Magma project's

• Contributing Conventions for norms around contributed code

If this is your first Magma PR, also consider reading

• Developer Onboarding for onboarding as a new Magma developer
• Development Workflow for guidance on your first pull request
• CI Checks for points of contact for failing or flaky CI checks
• GitHub-to-Slack mappings for Magma maintainers for guidance on how to contact maintainers on Slack

[github-actions]

dp-workflow

0 tests   0 ✔️  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit d45edff.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[voisey]

@LKreutzer Just FYI, I think the ready2merge tag should only be added if the PR has been approved already, while I think this one is still waiting for someone from approvers-bazel.

[LKreutzer]

@LKreutzer Just FYI, I think the ready2merge tag should only be added if the PR has been approved already, while I think this one is still waiting for someone from approvers-bazel.

@voisey You are right, I removed it.

[nstng]

LGTM