feature: add curried mode to glom

[jondot]

More info: #29

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #30 into master will increase coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #30      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.72%   83.96%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files           9       11       +2     
  Lines         805      817      +12     
  Branches      133      134       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          674      686      +12     
  Misses         91       91              
  Partials       40       40

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
glom/test/test_curried.py	100% <100%> (ø)
glom/curried.py	100% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d06e3d1...37b06f1. Read the comment docs.

[kurtbrose]

first, thanks very much for the PR!

we've had some internal discussions around something akin to re.compile() for a glom-spec which would probably cover this use case

e.g. build(spec).glom(target) or compile(spec).apply(target) -- something along those lines; having two functions named glom in the API seems confusing

also, it seems easy for users to create their own version of this if desired -- specific_glom = functools.partial(glom, spec={...})

from an internal structure perspective, 10 lines doesn't seem like enough functionality to justify its own module

[jondot]

Sure thing, feedback accepted. I’ll be watching for the complie functionality 👍🏻