[easier-user-interface] different separator for lemmata (or none)

[ousia]

Hi Maîeul,

the default lemmata separator is ], but I wonder whether this could be implemented:

\lemmaseparator[X]{x}

[X] should be optional and should work the same way as suggested for \nofootnoteline. It specifies the critical footnote group(s) to which the command applies.

{x} specifies the actual glyph that replaces the ] glyph for the specified groups.

It is very helpful to add the following commands:

\lemmaseparatorbeforeandafter[X]{before}{{after}
\nolemaseparator[X]

\nolemmaseparator should be \lemmaseparator{}, but that also sets \lemmaseparatorbeforeandafter{0pt}{0pt}. (I'd say that \lemmaseparator{} should be disabled to avoid confussion.)

\lemmaseparatorbeforeandafter{after}{before} should specify dimensions in both before and after. But I wonder whether it would be possible to add also an space (which has the same length as any other spaces in that line).

Many thanks again,

Pablo

[maieul]

I think this implementation will be easy, it's just a question to find time

[ousia]

I hope all my suggestions will be easy to implement, since they don't require new features (well, almost all :-)).

My aim is to have an interface that isn't unnecessarily complex to use and easier to work with.

Many thanks for your help,

Pablo

[ousia]

I have realized that there might be some other questions related to the \lemmaseparator.

I rewrite the first comment so the whole thing is clear.

[maieul]

Ok, so lemmaseparator is implement in branch 13. Could you try ?