-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MAISTRA-1627, MAISTRA-1660: Fix lint, gen-check and integration test failures #138
Conversation
* Add version label to metric Signed-off-by: Liam White <liam@tetrate.io> * back to gauge Signed-off-by: Liam White <liam@tetrate.io> Co-authored-by: Liam White <liam@tetrate.io>
…ease-1.6 (#25426)
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leaving this open until questions are answered.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Holding until we have Brian's question answered
…n upgrade with dry run option (#25207) (#25425) Co-authored-by: Zufar Dhiyaulhaq <zufardhiyaulhaq@gmail.com>
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
Co-authored-by: Oliver Liu <yonggangl@google.com>
Fixed the Copyright |
/test lint |
…ease-1.6 (#25553)
/test unit |
/test integration |
* fixed typo * fix the default behavior Co-authored-by: zhengzhey <zhengzhey@google.com>
…o MAISTRA-1627-v2 This brings in the fix for MAISTRA-1660.
All tests pass now. Turns out integration tests had an issue. Created MAISTRA-1660 for that. |
@jwendell This PR seems to include more than just lint and gen-check failures, can these be separated out into individual PRs? |
no. If we split it, tests will fail for both PR's. Unless we force-merge them. |
@jwendell please create a second JIRA to cover the additional work and include it in the description of this PR, we should not be sneaking in additional changes just for expedience. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requesting changes to cover additional commits included within this PR
@knrc done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jwendell thanks very much
This PR covers a bunch of fixes for failures:
make lint
works (MAISTRA-1627)make gen-check
works (MAISTRA-1627)For the last item we had to bring the fix from upstream release-1.6 branch, hence some commits not related to this PR itself. This is to avoid cherry-picking just one commit and have to resolve conflicts later.