Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 29, 2017. It is now read-only.

Bump S3G to master #85

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Bump S3G to master #85

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

skalnik
Copy link
Member

@skalnik skalnik commented Mar 27, 2013

Bumps s3g to master and also handles the added variables in their start gcode.

@@ -34,9 +34,14 @@
port = options.port
factory = makerbot_driver.MachineFactory()
obj = factory.build_from_port(port)
profile = getattr(obj, 'profile')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Try obj.profile here instead.

@awk
Copy link

awk commented Jul 31, 2013

It doesn't look like this pull request has been merged yet ? Is there a particular hold up ?

The newer s3g revision also includes the updated USB device IDs for newer revision MakerBot Replicator 2 models. Without the new device IDs the MachineDetector in s3g can't find and print to the device :-(

@skalnik
Copy link
Member Author

skalnik commented Jul 31, 2013

@awk Whoa didn't know that! I think we had a few issues with this that we didn't solve. Currently our make-me install is down as we move offices, but once we're moved I'll see what I can do to get this running.

Have you tried out this branch? Were there any issues you noticed?

@awk
Copy link

awk commented Jul 31, 2013

I'm hoping to grab the branch/patch and try it later today - I'll report back any issues (though my testing is likely to be 'light')

@awk
Copy link

awk commented Jul 31, 2013

I did a brief test with a build from the support-gcode-variables branch. I had two issues :

  1. the profile contained in the object returned from factory.build_from_port() is no longer a function but just a dictionary of values.
  2. StreamWriter will now raise a buffer overrun error which it expects to be caught and handled (with a retry) at the higher error.

The changes to print_gcode.py are pretty straightforward - would you like a new issue and a pull request for the support-gcode-variables branch with the fixes ?

@skalnik
Copy link
Member Author

skalnik commented Aug 13, 2013

@awk That'd be great. Target this branch instead of master 👍

@awk
Copy link

awk commented Aug 14, 2013

OK - I'm on vacation for a bit - it'll be about a week and I'll do the Pull Request

@skalnik
Copy link
Member Author

skalnik commented Aug 14, 2013

🤘 No worries. Enjoy your vacation. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants