-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test against QGIS, GDAL #744
Conversation
aa165c7
to
99b8db9
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 79.87% // Head: 79.89% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #744 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 79.87% 79.89% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 19 19
Lines 4169 4169
==========================================
+ Hits 3330 3331 +1
+ Misses 839 838 -1
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great approach and let's continue follow up PRs on additional QGIS or other baseline checks.
To evaluate the reliability of xarray-spatial, let's test the package and compare the results against QGIS/GDAL.
Fixes #22, #104, #182