Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some small fixes for running on slurm #64

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TomNicholas
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains a few small fixes which are needed in order to get any jobs to run on the SLURM scheduler.

The point of this isn't so much to be merged, but more that I couldn't be bothered to make separate issues for each one of these errors.

It contains one error to do with the job name, one to do with how job arrays are specified, one to do with cpus per task, plus a hack I had to put in because of the time conversion I mentioned in another issue.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #64 into master will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #64      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.58%   81.66%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         516      518       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          421      423       +2     
  Misses         95       95
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/experi/run.py 78.26% <100%> (+0.17%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5d1c1a7...bbf6d00. Read the comment docs.

@malramsay64
Copy link
Owner

It seems like you have accidentally committed the same changes as #59.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants