Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clearer definition of effects in 2D and 3D #238

Closed
malramsay64 opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Clearer definition of effects in 2D and 3D #238

malramsay64 opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@malramsay64
Projects
Corrections PhD

Comments

@malramsay64
Copy link
Owner

There are some differences between 2D and 3D systems where there are separate results and quantities calculated. I need to make the differences clearer.

Additionally I need to explain which aspects of the 2D systems are less likely to be generalisable to 3D.
@malramsay64 malramsay64 self-assigned this Jul 17, 2020
@malramsay64 malramsay64 added this to To do in PhD via automation Jul 17, 2020
@malramsay64 malramsay64 added this to To do in Corrections via automation Jul 17, 2020
@malramsay64 malramsay64 moved this from To do to In progress in Corrections Jul 30, 2020
@malramsay64
Copy link
Owner Author

This will also need to include 1D, with reference to rotations. See #250

malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Improve description of jump dynamics
91fe971 
These are when the motions are no longer described by Brownian motions.

This also includes some clarity on the values in both 2D and 3D

Fix #252
Ref #238
malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Clarify dimensionality of non-Gaussian
b66e518 
There are three different non-gaussians mentioned within this thesis,
the version usually referenced, being the 3D case, the version I am
using for 2D motions, and the version I am using for 1D rotations.
This gives the general case and the reasoning behind the use of each.

Ref #238
malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Make mention of dynamical effects where appropriate
2a5e079 
Ref #238
malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Include notes of jamming in 3D
da75480 
In 3D there is not the same degree of jamming present in 2D. This is
noted in the introduction.

Ref #238
malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Add notes about crystallisation in 3D
4c23fa1 
The move to 3D likely doesn't have the same rotational issues as in 2D.

Ref #238
malramsay64 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
@malramsay64
fix: Make note about moving to 3D in conclusion
62d8211 
This describes why 3D might be better for growth.

Ref #238
PhD automation moved this from To do to Done Sep 3, 2020
Corrections automation moved this from In progress to Done Sep 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@malramsay64 malramsay64

Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Corrections
  
Done
PhD
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@malramsay64