rust: Port cargo, ripgrep and exa
#102
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
ATM we're running into an issue when running I also don't like the fact that we need to hardcode all the lib versions in our ports (see the |
64
force-pushed
the
cargo
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4f676e2
to
fea953b
Compare
|
This is ready now, but it requires an |
|
LGTM. Thank you for the PR! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements support for
cargobuilds. We also portripgrepandexa, implementing the necessary patches for them to build.In order to test this PR, you must have managarm/xbstrap#48 merged locally, and then run
xbstrap init ../srcfrom yourbuilddirectory.