Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Postprocessors should have densities and then some postprocessors can go away #58

Closed
mangerij opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@mangerij
Copy link
Owner

Some of the postprocessors should have corresponding aux density fields. Then we can get rid of having a specific postprocessor for every piece of physics.

Will simplify and compactify the code...

@mangerij
Copy link
Owner Author

...maybe even speed up... assuming aux field calculation and then postprocessor integration is quicker than a postprocessor integration from a predefined field. This was from an older question/note. Maybe can test this idea...

mangerij added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant