Re #11081 Moved log.print command outside of loop #6
Conversation
|
This looks ok, just one comment: before, the 'wait for a second' had a very literal interpretation. Now that the print is outside the loop maybe something like 'waiting until some processes finish' or 'waiting until processors become available' would be more clear? Let me know and I'll merge this in. Also, related to this I'd suggest to put the '4' as a variable, more visible somewhere. I'd guess at some point this will be a configuration option? |
|
Good point on the log message, I will change it to something less decisive. Re: the 4 processes allowed, I believe it will be set as a particular number that no scripts will be able to configure, just the admin. I will put it as a more identifiable variable somewhere though, thanks. |
…log_message Re #11081 Moved log.print command outside of loop
|
This fixed ticket #11081. |
No description provided.