Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support TOSCA on IndirectTransmission #494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 2, 2015

Conversation

DanNixon
Copy link
Member

Fixes #10673.

To test:

  • Open Indirect > Tools > Transmission
  • Select TOSCA
  • Pick a sample material, default density and thickness will work
  • Run

Also try using the algorithm directly as per usage examples.

This is just taking the fixed energy of the first detector which I was not convinced was the correct way to get the energy of a detector bank but it seems to be giving the correct values as 5.5 Angstroms is about the correct position for the elastic peak on TOSCA.

@DanNixon DanNixon added Inelastic Indirect/Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to indirect or inelastic labels Mar 31, 2015
@DanNixon DanNixon added this to the Release 3.4 milestone Mar 31, 2015
@eXeC64 eXeC64 self-assigned this Apr 2, 2015
eXeC64 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2015
…nsmission_calc

Support TOSCA on IndirectTransmission
@eXeC64 eXeC64 merged commit 51032d0 into master Apr 2, 2015
@eXeC64 eXeC64 deleted the 10673_support_tosca_on_transmission_calc branch April 2, 2015 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Indirect/Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to indirect or inelastic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants