Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make implicit API expectation explicit #141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2015

Conversation

robpvn
Copy link
Contributor

@robpvn robpvn commented Aug 7, 2015

I was bitten by issue #42 when trying to implement a tilelive TileSource that used vector tiles, which by their nature are sparse. (My backend would faithfully emit error messages for missing tiles, but with a different wording which made tilelive crash out rather than just skip the tile.) Until the actual issue is resolved (which would mean bumping the API version and rewriting all tilelive implementations, I guess) it should be made an explicit part or the API doc.

I was bitten by issue mapbox#42 when trying to implement a tilelive TileSource that used vector tiles, which by their nature are sparse. (My backend would faithfully emit error messages for missing tiles, but with a different wording which med tilelive crash out rather than just skip the tile.) Until the actual issue is resolved (which would mean rewriting all tilelive implementations, I guess) it should be made an explicit part or the API doc.
@robpvn robpvn changed the title Make implicit API expectation implicit Make implicit API expectation explicit Aug 7, 2015
@robpvn
Copy link
Contributor Author

robpvn commented Aug 7, 2015

Ignore the fact that I made a rather silly typo in the commit title. 👌

@tmcw
Copy link
Contributor

tmcw commented Aug 7, 2015

👍 thanks @robpvn ! Merging

tmcw added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2015
Make implicit API expectation explicit
@tmcw tmcw merged commit f220154 into mapbox:master Aug 7, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants