Use curies' Converter in strict=False mode.
#409
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you @hrshdhgd!
Just so I can sleep well: can we add a test that is invoking sssom parse in "merged" mode with an incomplete curie map that contains at least two conflicting prefixes (compared to bioregistry)? |
|
Done. |
matentzn
previously approved these changes
Aug 11, 2023
Co-authored-by: Nico Matentzoglu <nicolas.matentzoglu@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This way, when a
prefix_maphas duplicateuri_prefixorprefixfrom the user,curieswill not throw an error.sssom-pyalready gives priority to a user-defined prefix map over the default one (which now is EPM from bioregistry).