Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Few labels placed with ANGLE FOLLOW, and REPEATDISTANCE set #4910

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Few labels placed with ANGLE FOLLOW, and REPEATDISTANCE set #4910

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

tbonfort
Copy link
Member

I'm using MapServer build from Master that was build today.

I want to have repeating labels placed around a linear feature. For some reason, I need to have a very high MAXOVERLAPANGLE to get something close to what I'm expecting: See here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3219487/label_test.png

The green feature on the left is using the default MAXOVERLAPANGLE value (i.e. it is not set in the label block). For some reason only two labels get placed.

The red feature on the right has MAXOVERLAPANGLE 90, and other than the cramped up labels in the corners, this is more like what I expected for the green feature.

My mapfile for mapserver-6.5 is here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3219487/label_issues.map

With MapServer 6.4 (after adding a fontset and font to the label blocks), I got a better result for the green feature: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3219487/test64.png

@tbonfort tbonfort added this to the 7.0 Release milestone Apr 24, 2014
@tbonfort tbonfort self-assigned this Apr 24, 2014
@tbonfort
Copy link
Member

@cnieman please have a try at the proposed fixed

@cnieman
Copy link
Contributor Author

cnieman commented Apr 25, 2014

@tbonfort that works as expected. Thanks.

@tbonfort
Copy link
Member

closed via 793bd36

@tbonfort tbonfort closed this Apr 25, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants