You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When making a note, not only text as a description but also a gps photo or more, overview and detailed photo, I would say it is mandatory, would say, I think, it is required.
This note is then a more positive contribution and a prove, what is seen.
Go for quality notes and not for quantity notes.
What we see now, that with Mapsme notes, we often can do nothing with it, because there is less or not reliable information.
Also think at the people, who could solve these notes, the time they spending at these not accurate notes, this is annoying. Also for me. That is why I come to this solution.
They give a website link, make a gps photo of this website link, then note solver see, where the information come from and can make a better decision. Less typo failures, for example.
A easy to use app is not always the solution to what you want to achieve, quality of the data must be of a standard, that is usable. For the people to who could work with it.
We can ask the note maker to spend some more time on this, in comparison with note solver, the time he spend on it.
There is always a question, where did you get this information?
Because often non active Openstreetmap taggers make this notes, it is a duty for Mapsme to inform about this. ASK.
The source of the description is important, some source we can not use because of licence, the Mapsme user must be aware of this, where did they get this information. That is also a reason, why often a note not can be solved. Reliability of the source.
"A photo often says more then thousands words"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Everyone use a smartphone.
When making a note, not only text as a description but also a gps photo or more, overview and detailed photo, I would say it is mandatory, would say, I think, it is required.
This note is then a more positive contribution and a prove, what is seen.
Go for quality notes and not for quantity notes.
What we see now, that with Mapsme notes, we often can do nothing with it, because there is less or not reliable information.
Also think at the people, who could solve these notes, the time they spending at these not accurate notes, this is annoying. Also for me. That is why I come to this solution.
They give a website link, make a gps photo of this website link, then note solver see, where the information come from and can make a better decision. Less typo failures, for example.
A easy to use app is not always the solution to what you want to achieve, quality of the data must be of a standard, that is usable. For the people to who could work with it.
We can ask the note maker to spend some more time on this, in comparison with note solver, the time he spend on it.
There is always a question, where did you get this information?
Because often non active Openstreetmap taggers make this notes, it is a duty for Mapsme to inform about this. ASK.
The source of the description is important, some source we can not use because of licence, the Mapsme user must be aware of this, where did they get this information. That is also a reason, why often a note not can be solved. Reliability of the source.
"A photo often says more then thousands words"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: