-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to re-edit on confirmation step #17
Comments
I think this is a great idea, would definitely accept a PR w/ this, or I can get around to it at one point |
mtimkovich
added a commit
to mtimkovich/pipe-rename
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2021
I wanted to work on marcusbuffett#17, but that requires reusing parts of the code which wasn't possible with the existing implementation. This also reduces the scope of some variables and makes it easier to read.
mtimkovich
added a commit
to mtimkovich/pipe-rename
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2021
After exiting the editor, adds 2 additional options: - `Edit` reopens the editor with user changes. - `Reset` reopens the editor with the initial filelist.
mtimkovich
added a commit
to mtimkovich/pipe-rename
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2021
After exiting the editor, adds 2 additional options: - `Edit` reopens the editor with user changes. - `Reset` reopens the editor with the initial filelist. Moved tempfile creation inside `open_editor` because MacOS was *not* happy with me trying to reopen a closed tempfile.
mtimkovich
added a commit
to mtimkovich/pipe-rename
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2021
After exiting the editor, adds 2 additional options: - `Edit` reopens the editor with user changes. - `Reset` reopens the editor with the initial filelist. Moved tempfile creation inside `open_editor` because MacOS was *not* happy with me trying to reopen a closed tempfile.
marcusbuffett
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 28, 2021
Add `edit` and `reset` options. (#17)
I guess this can be closed now, thanks @mtimkovich for the impl! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Imagine you make some changes, and at the confirmation step you realise you made a mistake.
It would be nice to be able to add more actions than yes/no like:
What do you think of this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: