Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

:stop-on-first-failure (Autotest Option) #318

Open
klauswuestefeld opened this issue Jun 7, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

:stop-on-first-failure (Autotest Option) #318

klauswuestefeld opened this issue Jun 7, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@klauswuestefeld
Copy link

I find myself scrolling up the repl to the first failure after a test run all the time.

Is it just me?

@arichiardi
Copy link

👍

@marick
Copy link
Owner

marick commented Jul 20, 2015

I'm wondering if it might be useful to have a way to tell autotest to "narrow in on this namespace". That is, keep tracking dependencies in all the sources, but only do reloading if a change would affect the namespace you're focused on.

When I get annoyed by this, I sometimes tell autotest to only consider two files - the source I'm working on and the file with its tests. But that involves enough typing that I don't do it regularly.

Question: when you're doing the scrolling, are you typically scrolling past N following failures?

@klauswuestefeld
Copy link
Author

Yes.
On Jul 20, 2015 10:49 AM, "Brian Marick" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm wondering if it might be useful to have a way to tell autotest to
"narrow in on this namespace". That is, keep tracking dependencies in all
the sources, but only do reloading if a change would affect the namespace
you're focused on.

When I get annoyed by this, I sometimes tell autotest to only consider two
files - the source I'm working on and the file with its tests. But that
involves enough typing that I don't do it regularly.

Question: when you're doing the scrolling, are you typically scrolling
past N following failures?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#318 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants