Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[MD055, MD056, MD057] Features for validating table format (#464)" #485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

jaymzh
Copy link
Member

@jaymzh jaymzh commented Nov 20, 2023

Description

This reverts commit 9d508cf.

While these rules seem good, they have caused regressions (see
#472). Reverting for
now until the original submitter has time to look into them.

Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz phil@ipom.com

Related Issues

#472

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (non-breaking change that does not add functionality but updates documentation)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • Wrote good commit messages
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with main, if not - rebase it
  • Added tests for all new/changed functionality, including tests for positive and negative scenarios
  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences

…arkdownlint#464)"

This reverts commit 9d508cf.

While these rules seem good, they have caused regressions (see
markdownlint#472). Reverting for
now until the original submitter has time to look into them.

Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
@jaymzh jaymzh merged commit f97a364 into markdownlint:main Nov 20, 2023
6 checks passed
@jaymzh jaymzh deleted the revert-464 branch November 20, 2023 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant