Python 3.11 compatibility/availability?

[exsell-jc]

Just checked other branches, and it seems the other branches are not for dev.

Just wondering what the latest would be on updates.

Also, wanted to put this interesting + recent tidypandas to attention. I thought you might like their solution to the col('NAME') situation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMJEnkA0YrE though I'm assuming because it's Python dictionary, perhaps it would suffer on performance?

[lindblb]

2nd this

[hmhensen]

Long update times for tidypolars make it difficult for me to rely on polars.

[markfairbanks]

Long update times for tidypolars make it difficult for me to rely on polars.

polars has been implementing changes (and breaking changes) faster than I can keep up with. Changing reverse to descending in .sort() was one of them. It's good that polars is constantly improving, but the API instability makes it a bit hard to build a package that depends on it unfortunately.

There are probably a lot more fixes necessary to get tidypolars back to a good state. I'll try to get to them at some point, but between a newborn and a new job I'm bit behind on keeping this package up to date. I've only had enough time lately to keep updates to R's tidytable and dtplyr.

[exsell-jc]

Hey @markfairbanks, double congrats! :)

Thanks for keeping us in the loop. No worries about it for now.

[hmhensen]

I understand, that makes sense. Congrats on the kid! Hopefully, polars matures soon and the changes start coming slower. You've done a great job on your package.

…

________________________________ From: Mark Fairbanks ***@***.***> Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 2:18:06 PM To: markfairbanks/tidypolars ***@***.***> Cc: hmhensen ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [markfairbanks/tidypolars] Python 3.11 compatibility/availability? (Issue #230) Long update times for tidypolars make it difficult for me to rely on polars. polars has been implementing changes (and breaking changes) faster than I can keep up with. Changing reverse to descending in .sort() was one of them. It's good that polars is constantly improving, but the API instability makes it a bit hard to build a package that depends on it unfortunately. There are probably a lot more fixes necessary to get tidypolars back to a good state. I'll try to get to them at some point, but between a newborn and a new job I'm bit behind on keeping this package up to date. I've only had enough time lately to keep updates to R's tidytable and dtplyr. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#230 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG2KZ7LMK3LBWWO47NW7433XOHQQ5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYJKNS6A>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>