You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2022. It is now read-only.
Matching does not support matching by path, but only element name. So, an expression like identifiers/identifierRecord[identifierTypeCode='MEDICAID_ID']/identifier is not supported. This means a data model itself needs to be changed in such cases to accommodate this shortcoming (e.g. add a uniquely named medicaidId element to every document).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’m using it independently. I do not intend to use DHF. In addition to path support, in general range indexes (element and path) should be supported. When dealing with 100K+ documents this makes a significant difference. However, I have filed a separate issue related to performance anyway.
Fuzzy matching is feasible for range indexes in the same way as you currently implement double-metaphone by looking up element values similar to a given value and use these values to query. I have done this already in our mastering solution, which works well and performs well.
Matching does not support matching by path, but only element name. So, an expression like identifiers/identifierRecord[identifierTypeCode='MEDICAID_ID']/identifier is not supported. This means a data model itself needs to be changed in such cases to accommodate this shortcoming (e.g. add a uniquely named medicaidId element to every document).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: