Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add shouldBeInRange for ClosedRanges #119 #160

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 18, 2020

Conversation

javatarz
Copy link
Contributor

@javatarz javatarz commented Oct 5, 2019

Description

Completes open issue #119 by implementing ClosedRange<T>.shouldBeInRange(ClosedRange<T>).

Also adds JVM support for backtick version.
Already a contributor so no addition to the AUTHORS file :)

Checklist

  • I've added my name to the AUTHORS file, if it wasn't already present.

Also add JVM support for backtick version
@MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for the contribution!
Could you consider to also add shouldNotContain, so that we have them together from the start?
That would be great :-)

Kshitij09 and others added 4 commits October 30, 2019 23:46
Resolved merge conflicts with javatarz/range-assertions branch. Added Unit tests for shouldNotBeInRange. Also made appropriate method call for backtick version. Added name into AUTHORS file.

Signed-off-by: Kshitij09 <kshitijpatil98@gmail.com>
Fix the link to Kshitij09's commits
@javatarz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @MarkusAmshove, @Kshitij09 has helped me out in implementing shouldNotContain. I've merged his PR and added him to the Authors list.

Can you have a look at this PR before merging?

@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove merged commit 87ada19 into MarkusAmshove:master Jan 18, 2020
@MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Owner

Thank you, I've merged it and put it onto my todo list for 1.60.
I'll give it a few days to see if I can also include #174 otherwise I'll release it :)

@MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Owner

This is now part of v1.60

MarkusAmshove added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants