Graphql data simple data provider: handle if type can't be found #5999
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Right now, if the naming of your filter parameter doesn't match the expected naming (
resourceFilter) the data provider errors out becausetypeisundefined. In our case, our filters are namedresourceFilterInputwhich seems like a fairly common pattern see kotlin docs and graphql docs. I think ideally, it would take in a parameter to adjust the naming convention the same way it does for query naming but this seems like a good temporary solution to at least make the filters usable for "nonstandard" naming practices.