Skip introspection on defined fields. #57
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some SQLAlchemy columns can't currently be introspected by
marshmallow-sqlalchemy, or can't be introspected in principle. For
example, columns defined using mapped SQL expressions (using
column_property
orobject_session
) don't have types and don't definea
nullable
attribute. In these rare cases, users may want to setcustom fields in their schemas. But this isn't currently possible, since
we raise a
ModelConversionError
when we encounter a column we can'tintrospect. This patch skips introspection when the user has explicitly
defined a field in the schema.
Alternatively, we could map
NullType
toRaw
inSQLA_TYPE_MAPPING
and handle properties that don't define
nullable
, which would allowusers to work with mapped expressions without schema field overrides. I
slightly prefer this approach, since it's a bit more flexible, and
because I don't think it's a bad thing for users to explicitly define
types of mapped expressions.
Probably too much discussion for a rare edge case. Thoughts @sloria?