Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Methods with generics comply with java version counterpart #174

Conversation

masesdevelopers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR manages methods containing generics array parameters which wasn't reflected in the right way from previous version.
Meanwhile fixes an unknown issue related to method with a single variadic argument not execute in the right way.

Related Issue

Closed #172
Fix #103

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers added bug Something isn't working JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue labels Apr 30, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers self-assigned this Apr 30, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers merged commit 898dc1d into masesgroup:master Apr 30, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers deleted the 172-some-methods-with-generics-does-not-comply-with-java-version-counterpart branch April 30, 2023 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Some methods with generics does not comply with Java version counterpart Updates variadic method execution
1 participant