New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
biblioAnalysis()
treats the same author with a different punctuation style differently
#38
Comments
Please send me your collection and your script. |
I am sorry, the issue caused by ## ----bibliometrix loading------------------------------------------------
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(bibliometrix))
## ----Data loading--------------------------------------------------------
D <- readFiles("http://jooyoungseo.com/test.bib")
## ----Data converting-----------------------------------------------------
M <- convert2df(D, dbsource = "isi", format = "bibtex")
## ----Author citation-----------------------------------------------------
## "STAHL G" and "STAHL G." are the same author but counted towards two different individuals as in "SCARDAMALIA M" and "SCARDAMALIA M."
CR <- citations(M, field = "author", sep = ";")
cbind(CR$Cited[1:10]) |
Solved |
Fantastic! Thank you very much for your hard work!! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have found that the current
biblioAnalysis()
function categorizes the same author with a different punctuation style into two different individuals.For example, there is "John Smith" denoted with Smith J. in journal A; Smith J in journal B.
Even though "Smith J" and "Smith J." are the same person, the internal function of bibliometrix counts them towards two different individuals just because of the punctuation (.).
Would there be anyway to identify the same individual regardless of their punctuation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: