Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mate-time-admin: 'Lock' button does not take effect #561

Open
HectorB-2020 opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

mate-time-admin: 'Lock' button does not take effect #561

HectorB-2020 opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@HectorB-2020
Copy link

HectorB-2020 commented Apr 26, 2020

Expected behaviour

"Time and Date Manager"
The button "Lock" must work and change its status Lock - Unlock.

Actual behaviour

"Time and Date Manager"
Regardless of how many times it is clicked, the button always shows "Lock" and its text says "Dialog is unlocked".

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

Menu, "Control center", "Hardware", "Time and Date Manager".
try clicking the button 'Lock'.

MATE general version

MATE 1.24.0

Package version

Linux Distribution

Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Focal Fossa) 64-bit
Kernel Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64

Link to downstream report of your Distribution

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-control-center/+bug/1955339

@zhuyaliang
Copy link
Member

zhuyaliang commented Feb 23, 2021

In the new version of systemd Polkit is no longer used to request authentication from users.Ordinary users can use timedatectl to modify time without authentication,The lock button may be removed later

@lukefromdc
Copy link
Member

lukefromdc commented Feb 23, 2021

That can be removed if and only if no distro shipping MATE 1.26 is using an older version of Systemd. Also, what are the implications of this for distros that don't use Systemd (e.g all BSD based distros)? Note that the latter concern does not apply if mate-time-admin depends on systemd and thus is not built without it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants