Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ripple): Prevent ancestors of nested ripple surfaces from activating #2123

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2018

Conversation

kfranqueiro
Copy link
Contributor

This allows JS-enhanced ripples to support nested surfaces (e.g. a checkbox within a list item) and avoid the ripple activating on both surfaces at once (it should only activate on the deepest surface interacted with).

Unfortunately this is probably not resolvable for CSS-only.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 29, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2123 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2123      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.43%   99.43%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          84       84              
  Lines        3720     3723       +3     
  Branches      486      486              
==========================================
+ Hits         3699     3702       +3     
  Misses         21       21
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/mdc-ripple/foundation.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 022e692...527765d. Read the comment docs.

@acdvorak acdvorak self-assigned this Jan 29, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@acdvorak acdvorak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants