Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validate line-mode with uniform input set #462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

munrojm
Copy link
Member

@munrojm munrojm commented Jul 14, 2022

Constructing the full k-path for line-mode calculations is too costly for the TaskValidation builder. To fix this, the uniform input set is instead used, and k-points are not validated. This still allows other checks (e.g. POTCAR hash checking) to be complete, without completely removing that task type from the validation list.

@munrojm munrojm added the release:patch Patch updates label Jul 14, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #462 (4645023) into main (75ecc45) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 77.77%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #462   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.63%   97.63%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines       23886    23887    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        23320    23321    +1     
  Misses        566      566           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
emmet-core/emmet/core/vasp/validation.py 70.96% <77.77%> (+0.18%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75ecc45...4645023. Read the comment docs.

@munrojm munrojm merged commit cbf7e2c into main Jul 14, 2022
@munrojm munrojm deleted the bugfix/line_mode_validation branch July 14, 2022 20:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release:patch Patch updates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants