Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underbraces #18

Closed
adius opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Underbraces #18

adius opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@adius
Copy link
Contributor

adius commented Jul 23, 2014

I think underbraces should be part of core AsciiMath.

This was already discussed in this issue: mathjax/MathJax#741

@drlippman
Copy link
Contributor

I'm fine with that. Should we just go with the "ubrace" token @dpvc suggested in 741?

@adius
Copy link
Contributor Author

adius commented Jul 23, 2014

I think we should support both underbrace and ubrace, as some might favour readability over length, shouldn't we?

@drlippman
Copy link
Contributor

While the new symbol that @dpvc suggested in 741 is sufficient to get an underbrace, it doesn't appear sufficient to get ubrace(1+2+3+4)_("4 terms") to work. I'll see if I can figure a way to get the proper munder tag.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants