Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenType MathTopAccentAttachment #65

Open
fred-wang opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

OpenType MathTopAccentAttachment #65

fred-wang opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@fred-wang
Copy link
Contributor

It it used during the layout of munderover

https://mathml-refresh.github.io/mathml-core/#underscripts-and-overscripts-munder-mover-munderover

but we need tests for that.

@fred-wang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Consensus from 2020/06: keep the current text for now, let's see if we have time to implement this and write tests etc. add a warning label

@NSoiffer
Copy link
Contributor

Current spec uses this for the layout of mtext: https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/#layout-of-mtext

Note: link above for munderover is out of date. Use https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/Overview.html#base-with-underscript-and-overscript. No mention of MathTopAccentAttachment in the layout algorithm there.

There is a mention that this is at risk in https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/Overview.html#glyph-information-mathglyphinfo.

@fred-wang: should this get a "needs spec update" or a "level 2" label?

@NSoiffer NSoiffer transferred this issue from w3c/mathml Jun 29, 2021
@fred-wang
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's mentioned in the layout of mover https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/#base-with-overscript which is itself used for the layout of munderover.

(I'm not sure whether we want this for level 1, I thought we had agreed to postpone many OpenType features for later. On the other hand this seems a small feature.)

Anyway, let's keep it open since it needs tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants