Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gh #228 exponential integral #267

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 25, 2014
Merged

Gh #228 exponential integral #267

merged 3 commits into from Dec 25, 2014

Conversation

glyphard
Copy link
Contributor

@glyphard glyphard commented Dec 7, 2014

implemented exponential integral. would like some feedback.
After that am happy to wrap up getting this hooked into gamma.cs

@glyphard
Copy link
Contributor Author

glyphard commented Dec 7, 2014

the build looks like the travis build broke on: LinearAlgebra/Single/Factorization/UserEvd.cs
I didn't make any changes to that file, as far as I can tell. Any guidance on how to fix the build?

@cdrnet
Copy link
Member

cdrnet commented Dec 7, 2014

Great, thanks!

No need to worry about the Travis build, it is due to a mono C# compiler bug in mono-3.10 and will (hopefully) resolve itself once 3.11 is available.

@glyphard
Copy link
Contributor Author

glyphard commented Dec 9, 2014

Should I continue with the final change to update the incomplete gamma to use this exponential integral function for a=0, or is there some refactoring I should do with this implementation?

cdrnet added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2014
@cdrnet cdrnet merged commit b0e7c06 into mathnet:master Dec 25, 2014
@cdrnet
Copy link
Member

cdrnet commented Dec 25, 2014

Finally merged, thanks again!

@cdrnet cdrnet mentioned this pull request Dec 25, 2014
@cdrnet
Copy link
Member

cdrnet commented Dec 25, 2014

Yes, would be great if we could leverage this to extend incomplete gamma to a=0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants