Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PHP7.4, Debian 11, face recognition installation is complaining of missing pdlib #649

Closed
drumstick77 opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@drumstick77
Copy link

Hey, Thanks for reporting issues back to Nextcloud Face Recognition. Please, try to complete this report in detail so we can help you easier. 馃槃

Make sure you read all the documentation, and the FAQ, and that the issue has not been reported before. 馃槈

Expected behaviour

it should just install facerecognition via app via Web UI

Actual behaviour

PHP7.4, Debian 11, face recognition installation is complaining of missing pdlib

Steps to reproduce

  1. went to app within the webui
  2. searched for facerecognition
  3. click download and enable

Server configuration

  • Operating system:
    debian bullseye

  • Pdlib version:

  • How is DLib installed: Make sure it is working correctly with this tool

  • How is PDlib installed: Make sure it is working correctly with this tool

  • PHP version:
    7.4

  • Web server:

  • Database:
    mySQL

  • Nextcloud version:
    25.04

Client configuration

  • Browser:

  • Operating system:

Logs

Background task log with debug.

sudo -u apache php occ -vvv face:background_job
Insert your background log here

Web server error log

Web server error log
Insert your webserver log here

Nextcloud log (data/nextcloud.log)

Nextcloud log
Insert your Nextcloud log here

Browser log

Browser log
Insert your browser log here, this could for example include:

a) The javascript console log
b) The network log
c) ...
matiasdelellis added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
To the happiness of many (Issue #690, #688, #687, 685, #649, #632,
extension, but it goes without saying that its use is still highly
recommended.

You will understand that it is slower, however I must admit that with
JIT enabled, it is quite acceptable, and this is the only reason why
decided to publish it.

It is still experimental, and it works, but it has problems such as it
seems not to converge in stable clusters. When I can fix this, it will
probably be even slower.
matiasdelellis added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
To the happiness of many (Issue #690, #688, #687, $685, #649, #632,
extension, but it goes without saying that its use is still highly
recommended.

You will understand that it is slower, however I must admit that with
JIT enabled, it is quite acceptable, and this is the only reason why
decided to publish it.

It is still experimental, and it works, but it has problems such as it
seems not to converge in stable clusters. When I can fix this, it will
probably be even slower.
matiasdelellis added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
To the happiness of many (Issue #690, #688, #687, #685, #649, #632,
extension, but it goes without saying that its use is still highly
recommended.

You will understand that it is slower, however I must admit that with
JIT enabled, it is quite acceptable, and this is the only reason why
decided to publish it.

It is still experimental, and it works, but it has problems such as it
seems not to converge in stable clusters. When I can fix this, it will
probably be even slower.
matiasdelellis added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
To the happiness of many (Issue #690, #688, #687, #685, #649, #632, #627, #625, etc),
this means that we do not depend on the pdlib extension, but it goes
without saying that its use is still highly recommended.

You will understand that it is slower, however I must admit that with
JIT enabled, it is quite acceptable, and this is the only reason why
decided to publish it.

It is still experimental, and it works, but it has problems such as it
seems not to converge in stable clusters. When I can fix this, it will
probably be even slower.
matiasdelellis added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2023
To the happiness of many (Issues #690, #688, #687, #685, #649, #632
, #627, #625, etc..?) this means that we do not depend on the pdlib
extension, but it goes without saying that its use is still highly
recommended.

You will understand that it is slower, however I must admit that with
JIT enabled, it is quite acceptable, and this is the only reason why
decided to publish it.
@matiasdelellis
Copy link
Owner

Hi,
I invite you to try the external model, using the latest version released.

Open a new issue to see how we continue. 馃槵

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants