Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add archive node support for remote setup #131

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Raneet10
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR adds support for spinning up archive nodes in a remote devnet setup.

Changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
  • New test case for remote devnet

Checklist

  • I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
  • I have added sufficient documentation in code
  • I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply

Testing

  • I have tested this code manually on local environment
  • I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
  • I have tested this code manually on mumbai

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Dec 12, 2022

@Raneet10 Raneet10 force-pushed the raneet10/pos-499 branch 3 times, most recently from 78bcf71 to c0418f7 Compare December 19, 2022 12:16
@Raneet10 Raneet10 force-pushed the raneet10/pos-499 branch 7 times, most recently from aeae4cd to 9121028 Compare December 20, 2022 14:41
@marcello33 marcello33 self-requested a review December 21, 2022 11:27
@Raneet10 Raneet10 marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 11:44
@Raneet10 Raneet10 merged commit e459c99 into master Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants