Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Threading API #3799

Closed
benparsons opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Threading API #3799

benparsons opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal rejected A proposal which has been rejected for inclusion in the spec
Projects
Spec Core Team Backlog

Comments

@benparsons
Copy link
Member

benparsons commented May 10, 2018 •
edited

Documentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bLAcYBvTYp2XNvUG-DuYv4E0uWThz_Cr6PHzspq7e60/edit
Author: @Half-Shot
Date: 23/05/2016
@ara4n ara4n added the proposal A matrix spec change proposal label May 15, 2018
@ara4n ara4n mentioned this issue Feb 24, 2019
Closed
@KB1RD KB1RD mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2019
Open
@turt2live turt2live added the kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success label Apr 21, 2020
@erlend-sh
Copy link

Superseded by the official RFC? #2326

@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Sep 27, 2020

nope, MSC #2326 is just for filtering by labels rather than navigating a tree of threads.

@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Oct 30, 2020

may be superseded by #2836 tho (if it ends up including swimlanes via #2326)

@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
@ara4n ara4n transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec May 9, 2022
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

It appears we have settled on #3440 for our threading implementation:

@mscbot fcp close

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 19, 2022 •
edited by erikjohnston

Team member @turt2live has proposed to close this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added disposition-close proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Jul 19, 2022
@turt2live turt2live added this to Ready for FCP ticks in Spec Core Team Backlog Jul 19, 2022
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 26, 2022

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Jul 26, 2022
@richvdh richvdh moved this from Ready for FCP ticks to In FCP in Spec Core Team Backlog Jul 26, 2022
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Jul 31, 2022

The final comment period, with a disposition to close, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot closed this as completed Jul 31, 2022
@mscbot mscbot added finished-final-comment-period and removed disposition-close final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. labels Jul 31, 2022
@turt2live turt2live added rejected A proposal which has been rejected for inclusion in the spec and removed finished-final-comment-period labels Jul 31, 2022
@turt2live turt2live moved this from In FCP to Done to some definition in Spec Core Team Backlog Jul 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal rejected A proposal which has been rejected for inclusion in the spec
Projects
Spec Core Team Backlog
  
Done to some definition
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
7 participants
@erlend-sh @turt2live @benparsons @ara4n @anoadragon453 @richvdh @mscbot