Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Message lifetimes #1151

Closed
Biep opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Message lifetimes #1151

Biep opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@Biep
Copy link

Biep commented Jun 29, 2022

This issue, described here, has both a server and a client component.

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Closing in favour of MSC: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#2228

@Biep
Copy link
Author

Biep commented Jun 29, 2022

Doesn't that do way less? Or do you mean the rest of my proposal can be done client-only?
My proposal would be that delivery time can be done on the server - no need to have the client running at the moment that the server needs to deliver the message. In fact, my reason for using future delivery may be precisely because I know my device will be off-line when delivery is needed.

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

The MSC is the same sort of system you described in your other issue, so would recommend leaving any concerns you have with the MSC on the MSC.

@Biep
Copy link
Author

Biep commented Jun 29, 2022

I have seen the abbreviation, but do not know what "MSC" means. "Matrix-spec-?".
I had made proposals for Element Web / Desktop, was asked to move them if I was still interested, and did move them.
Did I do something wrong?

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

turt2live commented Jun 29, 2022

Matrix Spec Change: https://spec.matrix.org/unstable/proposals/

Moving issues to more appropriate repos is fine, however it doesn't guarantee that the issue stays open. For the spec we try to consider whether an issue is likely to be actioned or able to be actioned when deciding if it stays open or not. In this issue's case, there's already an MSC opened which talks about the feature so we'd prefer to have discussions there.

Edit: wrong issue context.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants