Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define opaque identifier grammar #1791

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 17, 2024
Merged

Define opaque identifier grammar #1791

merged 3 commits into from Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

richvdh
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh commented Apr 16, 2024

Since we already have three of these, and I'm about to add a fourth, let's pull
it out to a common definition.

We could, of course, keep defining the grammar each time it's used, but
defining it in an appendix helps us be consistent for future API design.

Preview: https://pr1791--matrix-spec-previews.netlify.app

Since we already have three of these, and I'm about to add a fourth, let's pull
it out to a common definition.

We could, of course, keep defining the grammar each time it's used, but
defining it in an appendix helps us be consistent for future API design.
@richvdh richvdh requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2024 21:30
Copy link
Contributor

@clokep clokep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable!

@clokep
Copy link
Contributor

clokep commented Apr 16, 2024

Needs a newsfragment though.

@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Apr 17, 2024

Needs a newsfragment though.

Sigh. I even wrote one, then forgot to git add it :/

@richvdh richvdh merged commit 073ce65 into main Apr 17, 2024
12 checks passed
@richvdh richvdh deleted the rav/opaque_identifiers branch April 17, 2024 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants