Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow providing a text alternative/caption for all media/non-text-content #883

Open
Mikaela opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol

Comments

@Mikaela
Copy link

Mikaela commented Aug 12, 2021

Suggestion

I would like to specify an alternative text for all media content uploaded to Matrix including casual uploads, user avatar and room avatar, and I think this should be supported to comply with WCAG 2.1 non-text content. I think that especially in the context of file uploads during chat (as in not avatar change) there should be an option to always have it visible.

Examples:

  • The Matrix experience naturally improves for an vision impaired user.
  • Terminal user interface applications could possibly show the alt-text where they cannot show an avatar?
  • Matrix Suomi is using the image below as an avatar. Just like I can describe it here on the web, I would like to be able to describe it for users who cannot see the image itself, e.g. "Matrix Finland logo combines the brackets from Matrix logo with the cross as seen in the flag of Finland."
    • Matrix Suomi logo combines the brackets from Matrix logo with the cross as seen in the flag of Finland
  • LGBT* flags are very diverse and I imagine not even all LGBT* people recognize all the flags under the umbrella. When one is used as a room avatar or similar, it could be named and possibly a bit of where it comes from explained. This could also be used for other less known symbols.
  • A furry could explain their fursona in greater detail than may be obvious from the text, especially in case of a less common "species".
  • WCAG 2.1 has additional details for Understanding Success Criterion 1.1.1: Non-text Content
    .

This is similar to #882 (media attribution fields) and I was discussing this with @Sorunome, but she pointed out that attribution is different from text explanation what is in the picture and the user may not understand to put attribution/copyright information to this field.

@Mikaela Mikaela added the enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol label Aug 12, 2021
@kevincox
Copy link

I think that in this case it probably makes more sense to stick the caption where the image is used. The ideal caption might differ depending on the context. But I agree that it could be useful to have descriptions for things like room and user avatars.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants