New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify handling of opening and closing parentheses #40
Comments
Yes, that would be great, I have to think about it, maybe we can have another flag to allow that or a special field to specified a list of valid extra prefixes, like |
I'd appear that post 1.0 we probably want to change the semantics as:
so the config entry might look like this:
For 1.0 I'll see if I can quickly add the |
Wasn't it fixed after #67 and release of v1.1.0? |
cc @levb on above note from Andrey |
@andrey-yantsen #67 failed to be backwards compatible, but #71 introduced the |
#24 added support so a message like
(see GH-1234)
can haveGH-1234
autolinked, but the other way round doesn't work, so(GH-1234 might solve your bug)
won't be autolinked.This can already be worked around by enabling DisableNonWordPrefix and then using a custom regex to specify the boundary, but I think more consistent default logic makes more sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: