Combine common code b/w Monster and User #14
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using
**kwargs
, we can easily pass all the parameters to theUser
constructor in a dictionary without requiring the constructor to
contain parameters for the values that both it and
Entity
need.Whatever User needs will not be in the
**kwargs
passed to Entity,so Entity only gets the leftovers.
going forward.
As part of these changes, I've also made it so that
User
isinstantiated directly using the DB document, as well as the
Monster
being instantiated directly using the values from the YAML. This
requires that
User
/Monster
/Entity
member names match DB/YAML field names,though transform functions could easily be created later on to switch
between what the YAML/DB needs and what the code needs. For the time
being, the simplicity is nice as I'm adding new fields, etc., though
the negatives are clear with an approach like this. It should not be
something that stays indefinitely.