-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Groups codes by pairs or threes depending on character count #216
Conversation
That's a clever and elegant solution. 👍 |
I much prefer this over the always-by-twos approach that currently exists. |
Is there a particular reason why this has been shelved? |
@jansenfuller I think it just needs to be brought to the attention of @mattrubin |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #216 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 40.21% 40.26% +0.05%
===========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 2268 2270 +2
===========================================
+ Hits 912 914 +2
Misses 1356 1356
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
I'm sorry for the long delay in addressing this issue! After much thought, I've opened a new PR which adds a settings screen that allows the user to choose whether they prefer passwords rendered in groups of two digits or groups of three. I'd love to hear feedback from all the folks who prefer groups of three on whether this new approach feels like a satisfactory solution. |
This PR has been superseded by #290. Thank you to @beaucollins for this proposal! |
Purely an opinion but I find it easier to read two groups of three digits vs three groups of two digits.
And for 8 digit length codes I would say two groups of four digits would be better than four groups of two digits.
This change groups any code divisible by three into groups of three, divisible by two in pairs, otherwise no groupings.