Support for require() #86

andreineculau opened this Issue Oct 19, 2011 · 2 comments

3 participants


If coffeekup supports coffeescript helpers, then why not add support for requiring a module?

One could then require "fs", read files, etc


I second that, but just to clarify it - a require inside a template, so the scope is not too narrowed down.


please see issue #110

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment