Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 5623 backend #5625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Issue 5623 backend #5625

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

elzadj
Copy link
Collaborator

@elzadj elzadj commented Jun 20, 2024

Description

Fixes
Screenshot from 2024-06-20 14-36-31

How Has This Been Tested?

You can re-create it on test drive, staging, or on master (but it's a bit random on the local master).
Import Pure Blog Dark PBGD-PRO-28 (or light), check the console, switch the relation to author, tags, or category.

Test checklist

_ Front/Back Testing _

  • Test the component in normal state in sidebar
  • Test the component in hover state in sidebar (if hover exists)
  • Check that the settings work on frontend
  • Check that backend works and saves the settings after the editor reload
  • Same 1-4 points for the toolbar
  • Same 1-4 points on responsive
  • Test the block inside the grid (Container + Row + Column)
  • Test the block as a standalone block
  • Duplicate the block, test that the settings of the first do not affect the second
  • Test with 2 blocks of the same type

_ Pre-Code Testing _

  • Test the component in normal state in sidebar
  • Test the component in hover state in sidebar (if hover exists)
  • Check that the settings work on frontend
  • Check that backend works and saves the settings after the editor reload
  • Same 1-4 points for the toolbar
  • Same 1-4 points on responsive
  • Test the block inside the grid (Container + Row + Column)
  • Test the block as a standalone block
  • Duplicate the block, test that the settings of the first do not affect the second
  • Test with 2 blocks of the same type
  • Check no commented code and no unnecessary imports
  • Standards of the project have been followed
  • No errors/warnings on console

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings/errors
  • I have added/updated tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved stability by ensuring getDCMedia function returns null early if data is falsy, preventing potential errors.

@elzadj elzadj requested a review from Olekrut June 20, 2024 12:05
@elzadj elzadj self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to getDCMedia.js add an early check for a falsy data value. If data is null or undefined, the function now immediately returns null. This adjustment ensures smoother handling of potentially invalid input, mitigating errors or unexpected behaviors downstream in the function's execution.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/extensions/DC/getDCMedia.js Introduced a check for falsy data at the start of getDCMedia function, returning null early.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant getDCMedia
    participant DataHandler
    
    User->>getDCMedia: Call function with data
    getDCMedia-->>getDCMedia: Check if data is falsy
    alt Data is falsy
        getDCMedia-->>User: Return null
    else Data is valid
        getDCMedia->>DataHandler: Process data
        DataHandler-->>getDCMedia: Return processed data
        getDCMedia-->>User: Return result
    end

Poem

In code's meadow, data flows did bloom,
A quick check saves from falsy gloom.
Now early returns keep errors at bay,
getDCMedia leads in a smoother way.
🐇✨ Coding with care through night and day!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 393dd8d and 8cde64c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/extensions/DC/getDCMedia.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/extensions/DC/getDCMedia.js (1)

80-81: Adding an early return for falsy data values is a good defensive programming practice.

It helps prevent errors downstream by ensuring that only valid data is processed. This change aligns with robust error handling and input validation practices. Ensure that all callers of this function are aware that it can now explicitly return null.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by maintainer label Jun 20, 2024
@elzadj elzadj merged commit 75b4fc7 into master Jun 20, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.8.9 Final code review lgtm This PR has been approved by maintainer 🧑‍🚒 need for theme 🧑‍🚒 👩‍💻 pre-code testing size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants