-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add contribution templates + minor doc improvements #112
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #112 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 100% 100%
Complexity 133 133
=======================================
Files 6 6
Lines 556 556
=======================================
Hits 556 556 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are your thoughts about the following (may be adapted to PR template), extra diamond plated, branding version?
[ ] Bug in MO4 sniffer rule.
[ ] Bug in MO4 auto-fixer.
[ ] Bug in MO4 documentation.
[ ] Request to extend MO4 sniffer with specific rule.
[ ] Request to extend MO4 auto-fixer for specific rule.
[ ] Request to extend MO4 documentation.
[ ] Other (explain):
d83e96d
to
296d4f8
Compare
fixed, train wifi seems to work today %) |
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Outdated
|
||
* [ ] Bugfix | ||
* [ ] New Feature | ||
* [ ] Breaking change |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think "Breaking Change" should be on a separate Line/Section and the third point should be "something else" or "other".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regarding the addition of "else": full ack 👍
Regarding the "Breaking change" box: how would you propose to name this section?
I certainly get your point, I wasn't sure about this either, but in the end I thought that nobody forbids you to check multiple boxes (these are intentionally check boxes, not radio boxes). But as I said, I'm not sure about this and happy to discuss :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, maybe just a headline "Is this a breaking chnage"? Otherwise we could also handle this with setting a respective label when reviewing.
296d4f8
to
05e641d
Compare
@mmoll I slightly altered the PR and placed the breaking change part into its own section. Would you mind having another look? :) |
merged, danke @Ma27! |
This is just a proposal, I think it's helpful for first-time contributors to provide them a template which "tells" them what kind of information is needed.