You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One thing I've found when specifying compound statements like foo <= bar is that to test it properly, I need to expand it into foo < bar || foo == bar, then mutate that statement. Simply changing the sign does not expose all possible mutations.
It would be nice for mutant to expand those statements first, then mutate the expanded expression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like this mutation. We could first emit the mutation from: foo <= bar to foo < bar || foo == bar as neutral mutation, and then the mutations of the expansion as evil ones.
One thing I've found when specifying compound statements like
foo <= bar
is that to test it properly, I need to expand it intofoo < bar || foo == bar
, then mutate that statement. Simply changing the sign does not expose all possible mutations.It would be nice for mutant to expand those statements first, then mutate the expanded expression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: