Add Reply-To function

[peteroneilljr]

Adding Reply-To function mentioned in issue #140

[mbrt]

Thanks a lot for the contribution!

I was trying to test this out, but I couldn't make it work.
It seems that Gmail doesn't support this at all? https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7190?hl=en.

[mbrt]

Actually I was wrong, it does seem to work, it's just undocumented.

I was able to create a filter that does just that and it seems to work.

FFR, here's the exported version:

<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:apps='http://schemas.google.com/apps/2006'>
	<title>Mail Filters</title>
	<id>tag:mail.google.com,2008:filters:...</id>
	<updated>2021-09-27T19:35:54Z</updated>
	<author>
		<name>Me</name>
		<email>me@gmail.com</email>
	</author>
	<entry>
		<category term='filter'></category>
		<title>Mail Filter</title>
		<id>tag:mail.google.com,2008:filter:z...</id>
		<updated>2021-09-27T19:35:54Z</updated>
		<content></content>
		<apps:property name='hasTheWord' value='replyto:mbrt/gmailctl'/>
		<apps:property name='shouldNeverSpam' value='true'/>
		<apps:property name='sizeOperator' value='s_sl'/>
		<apps:property name='sizeUnit' value='s_smb'/>
	</entry>
</feed>

[mbrt]

I'm looking through the changes and they look good!

There's only one place I could see missing:

• README.md, section Tests, about the new replyto field in the test object.

[peteroneilljr]

Hi @mbrt was it as simple as updating the list of fields available for the test object? Or is there an actual test object that needs to be updated?

[mbrt]

Tests are also failing. See the results here.

One way to fix this is to do the following:

go test ./... --update
go test ./...

The first command should trigger the regeneration of the golden test files here: https://github.com/mbrt/gmailctl/blob/master/pkg/config/lib_test.go#L18. The second will run all the tests. If nothing fails we should be good to go!

[peteroneilljr]

Alright, everything should be fixed now. I was updating all of the same files that were updated when BCC was added as an operator and It seems I updated an autogenerated file used by the Go tests.

[mbrt]

Sorry for the delay in responding.

Actually the file you updated was good, it's the input to the test. The result is checked against the JSON files that are updated through the commands in the comment above.

If you remove it, there's no test for the new field you added, so a future change might break the behavior. Could you please add it back and fix the tests? Then we are truly good to go.

[peteroneilljr]

Ok I think the tests are fixed now! :)

[mbrt]

Looks good, thanks!

[mbrt]

Thanks for the contribution! :)

[gtback]

Thanks, @peteroneilljr !