Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Use go 1.9 in travis ci builds, fixes #20 #21

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Use go 1.9 in travis ci builds, fixes #20 #21

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

salimane
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Salimane Adjao Moustapha me@salimane.com

Signed-off-by: Salimane Adjao Moustapha <me@salimane.com>
@salimane salimane changed the title Use go 1.9 in travis ci builds Use go 1.9 in travis ci builds, fixes #20 Sep 25, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 25, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #21 into master will decrease coverage by 2.15%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #21      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.48%   49.32%   -2.16%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         606      744     +138     
==========================================
+ Hits          312      367      +55     
- Misses        254      337      +83     
  Partials       40       40
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
client.go 70.42% <0%> (-5.85%) ⬇️
util.go 80.95% <0%> (-3.96%) ⬇️
daemon.go 59.64% <0%> (-3.4%) ⬇️
marathon.go 80.95% <0%> (-3.05%) ⬇️
box.go 60.16% <0%> (-2.34%) ⬇️
main.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
kms.go 24.13% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
commands.go 81.81% <0%> (+1.81%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ca56ce1...4a7c4c7. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@stiangrindvoll stiangrindvoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants