Clarify usage of "RTP" and "RTCP" in the document #190
Conversation
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic.md
Outdated
| This specification describes an application usage of QUIC ({{?RFC9308}}). | ||
| As a baseline, the specification does not expect more than a standard QUIC implementation | ||
| This document describes an application usage of QUIC ({{?RFC9308}}). | ||
| As a baseline, the Document does not expect more than a standard QUIC implementation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| As a baseline, the Document does not expect more than a standard QUIC implementation | |
| As a baseline, the document does not expect more than a standard QUIC implementation |
| as defined in {{!RFC8999}}, {{!RFC9000}}, {{!RFC9001}}, and {{!RFC9002}}, | ||
| providing a secure end-to-end transport that is also expected to work well through NATs and firewalls. | ||
| Beyond this baseline, real-time applications can benefit from QUIC extensions such as unreliable DATAGRAMs | ||
| {{!RFC9221}}, which provides additional desirable properties for | ||
| real-time traffic (e.g., no unnecessary retransmissions, avoiding head-of-line | ||
| blocking). | ||
|
|
||
| ## What's in Scope for this Specification {#in-scope} | ||
| ## What's in Scope for this document {#in-scope} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| ## What's in Scope for this document {#in-scope} | |
| ## What's in Scope for this Document {#in-scope} |
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic.md
Outdated
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: "RTP over QUIC (RoQ)" | |||
| title: "RTP and RTCP over QUIC (RoQ)" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with the other changes, but I don't think it is necessary to change the title. RTCP is part of RTP in RFC 3550, which only has RTP in its title.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with the other changes, but I don't think it is necessary to change the title. RTCP is part of RTP in RFC 3550, which only has RTP in its title.
@mengelbart - thank you for pushing back on this change. My intention going into this PR was to make it obvious that what we said about encapsulation applied to both RTP Data Transfer Protocol and RTP Control Protocol, but after I added the Note to the Reader about this, I ought to have reversed the proposed change to the title.
And I am slightly cursing under my breath that "RTCP" caught on, but "RTDTP" never did! 😵💫
|
I've applied @mengelbart's review comments, and am merging now. |
closes #188