-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Performance] Add support to use SSL certs for load testing. #8023
Conversation
Signed-off-by: MUzairS15 <muzair.shaikh810@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: MUzairS15 <muzair.shaikh810@gmail.com>
One or two items are to be completed before merging. |
This PR has been labeled with 'component/ui'. 🧰 Here are docs on Contributing to Meshery UI. 🎨 Here is the Meshery UI Figma File File. Lastly, here are docs on Contributing to Meshery's End-to-End Tests Using Cypress
|
Signed-off-by: Mohd Uzair <muzair.shaikh810@gmail.com>
// @leecalcote |
This is for Fortio only, it modifies the performance profile to be able to capture and associate a single file, right? |
Yes and use them while load testing, to my knowledge nighthawk doesn’t support this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding this feature, I leave some comments.
When "cert" query param is set the body contains self-signed certs | ||
and not the SMP config, hence we shouldn't use SMP Handler, | ||
if query param is unset/not present presence of body | ||
if values have been passed as body we run test using SMP Handler | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add "cert" as a param in the SMP config?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we should add. // service-mesh-performance/service-mesh-performance#389
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MUzairS15 Good!
Signed-off-by: MUzairS15 <muzair.shaikh810@gmail.com>
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8023 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 5.23% 5.20% -0.03%
=========================================
Files 124 124
Lines 17473 17548 +75
=========================================
Hits 914 914
- Misses 16387 16462 +75
Partials 172 172
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@abhi |
@MUzairS15 Let's discuss this on Meshery Dev call. Please add this as an agenda item in the meeting minutes if you would. :) |
Signed-off-by: Mohd Uzair <muzair.shaikh810@gmail.com>
Notes for Reviewers
This PR fixes #7952
Signed commits